Re: (No subject)

[Wolfgang Laun]

That was a very roundabout way of asking, "Is there a better way than what
I'm using right now?" You would have heard "no" in
 the first answer.
-W

On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 15:25, john doe <address@hidden> wrote:

> 04.04.2020, 16:04, "Wolfgang Laun" <address@hidden>:
>
> > Running a pipeline that has one or more participants that need a script
> from a single file is best done by using a shell script. There is no better
> "glue" than one of the (standard) shell.
>
> That's exactly what I'm using right now. However, it's either one clumsy
> shell script, with awk code included, or two files, with awk code, pretty
> big in this case, stored n a separate file.
>
> Anyway, all I really wanted was some sort of a confirmation ("it's an
> expected behaviour", "nothing can be done", etc), and I got it.
>
>
> Grateful for your generosity,
>
>
> --
> JD
>
>