[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (No subject)
From: |
john doe |
Subject: |
Re: (No subject) |
Date: |
Sat, 04 Apr 2020 14:21:37 +0300 |
04.04.2020, 14:14, "Wolfgang Laun" <address@hidden>:
> Did it occur to you that option 2 does not only run /bin/cat (which it
> hopefully really does) but, in addition to cat and gawk, also shell process
> which does a lot of work up front that has already been done when option 1
> really kicks off with its two processes.
So, if I want to avoid pipes, and need just one self-containing script to be
called (and also don't want to spawn any excessive processes), the solution to
that problem would be..?
Thank you,
--
JD
- [no subject], john doe, 2020/04/04
- Re:, Wolfgang Laun, 2020/04/04
- Re: (No subject),
john doe <=
- Re: (No subject), Davide Brini, 2020/04/04
- Re: (No subject), john doe, 2020/04/04
- Re: (No subject), Wolfgang Laun, 2020/04/04
- Message not available
- Re: (No subject), john doe, 2020/04/04
- Re: (No subject), Wolfgang Laun, 2020/04/04
- Re: (No subject), john doe, 2020/04/04
- Re: (No subject), Davide Brini, 2020/04/04
- Re: (No subject), john doe, 2020/04/04
- Re: (No subject), Wolfgang Laun, 2020/04/04
- Re: (No subject), john doe, 2020/04/04