bug-findutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: null separated ls output option


From: Kaz Kylheku (Coreutils)
Subject: Re: null separated ls output option
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 10:17:16 -0700
User-agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.2

On 28.06.2017 23:31, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
[adding findutils]
First of all, find(1) is maintained in the GNU findutils project,
not in GNU coreutils.

Redirected from:
  http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2017-06/msg00049.html

On 06/28/2017 07:13 PM, Kaz Kylheku (Coreutils) wrote:
> [ snip ... my elaborate proposal for a find -sort predicate ]

I think the GNU toolbox already gives you enough flexibility to support
these edgy use cases, e.g. sorting by file size:

  find . -printf "%s/%p\0" \
    | sort -zt '/' -k1,1n  \
    | sed -z 's,^.*/,,'

That is great. So there is nothing do here, basically; all the better.

No null-terminated patch for ls is required; GNU sort can sort the
specially formatted null-terminated output from find.

See; it pays to have a discussion about the requirements
before whipping up code.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]