[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug #30504] bug/rfe....the "-P" option seems to be unusable by itself
From: |
Linda A. Walsh |
Subject: |
[bug #30504] bug/rfe....the "-P" option seems to be unusable by itself |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Jul 2010 05:24:21 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100625 Firefox/3.6.6 |
URL:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?30504>
Summary: bug/rfe....the "-P" option seems to be unusable by
itself
Project: findutils
Submitted by: law
Submitted on: Tue 20 Jul 2010 10:24:20 PM PDT
Category: xargs
Severity: 3 - Normal
Item Group: None
Status: None
Privacy: Public
Assigned to: None
Originator Name:
Originator Email:
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
Release: 4.4.0
Fixed Release: None
_______________________________________________________
Details:
I'd like to suggest the -P option be 'fixed' to be usable by itself.
If I use the -P option by itself I want xargs __ to try__ to use up to
"N" processors... Right now, it doesn't try at all unless you force
it to by using the -n/-l options.
That makes it sorta worthless...
I'd like to decide what is a good number of processes to run concurrently
for
a given "program" (that is to be run under xargs) and have xargs work out
the
rest.
I don't know what the total number of args is, so the only valid option,
most
of the time, is -n1.
I'd like to suggest that the program default to -n1 when -P is specified
alone --
making a -P option, by itself, "useful"...otherwise, my 'max' cpus values is
ignored and xargs will never use more than 1 cpu. That's certainly NOT
the intent if someone specifies "-P" by itself without "-n"...
Wouldn't this make sense?
yes?
thanks!
Linda
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?30504>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [bug #30504] bug/rfe....the "-P" option seems to be unusable by itself,
Linda A. Walsh <=