[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Suggestion for updatedb

From: leslie . polzer
Subject: Re: Suggestion for updatedb
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 14:15:21 +0200
User-agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (Linux)

On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:28:45AM +0100, James Youngman wrote:

> This change makes a great deal of sense. Unfortunately, there are a
> number of difficulties with the idea. None of them are insuperable
> perhaps, but here they are:

Lots of what you said concerns locate.  Is there any serious reason not
to ``sort -u | sort -f'' in *updatedb*?


Personal homepage: https://viridian.dnsalias.net/~sky/homepage/
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys DD4EBF83

Attachment: pgpMBjQVoAY63.pgp
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]