[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: updatedb files portable?
From: |
Peter Fales |
Subject: |
Re: updatedb files portable? |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Dec 2005 08:02:50 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 08:44:52AM +0000, James Youngman wrote:
> So I think the upshot is that the best thing for you to do would be to
> use the 'new' database format. Is that practical for you, or wold you
> prefer to make a code modification?
Using the "new" database looks like it will work for us. I was under
the impression that the format changed between 4.1 and 4.2.26, so
that --old-format was needed to stay compatible with 4.1, but that's
is apparently not the case. And, yes, new format databases seem to
be portable across our various platforms. Thanks for the help.
--
Peter Fales Lucent Technologies, Room 1C-436
N9IYJ 2000 Lucent Ln, PO Box 3033
internet: address@hidden Naperville, IL 60566-7033
work: (630) 979-8031
- updatedb files portable?, Peter Fales, 2005/12/06
- Re: updatedb files portable?, James Youngman, 2005/12/06
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: updatedb files portable?, James Youngman, 2005/12/08
- Re: updatedb files portable?,
Peter Fales <=
- Re: updatedb files portable?, James Youngman, 2005/12/08
- Re: updatedb files portable?, Peter Fales, 2005/12/08
- Re: updatedb files portable?, Andreas Metzler, 2005/12/10
- Re: updatedb files portable?, Eric Blake, 2005/12/10
- Re: updatedb files portable?, James Youngman, 2005/12/10