[bug-diffutils] bug#24228: bug#24228: [platform-testers] new snapshot available: diffutils-3.4.9-d647

[Jim Meyering]

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Jim Meyering <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:02 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> Am 19.08.2016 um 06:18 schrieb Jim Meyering <address@hidden>:
>>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Dagobert Michelsen <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>> Am 15.08.2016 um 07:33 schrieb Jim Meyering <address@hidden>:
>>> ...
>>>>> http://meyering.net/diff/diffutils-3.4.9-d647.tar.xz
>>>
>>> Thank you for testing.
>>>
>>>> I get this error on Solaris 10 Sparc with GCC 5.2, same for
>>>> Solaris 11 Sparc with GCC 5.2:
>>>>
>>>>>  CC       rawmemchr.o
>>>>> rawmemchr.c: In function 'rawmemchr':
>>>>> rawmemchr.c:49:18: error: cast increases required alignment of target 
>>>>> type [-Werror=cast-align]
>>>>>   longword_ptr = (const longword *) char_ptr;
>>>>>                  ^
>>>>> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>>>>> gmake[2]: *** [Makefile:1784: rawmemchr.o] Error 255
>>>
>>> In this case, I think the best advice it not to with warnings enabled
>>> (don't use configure's --enable-gcc-warnings) unless you're using a
>>> sufficiently modern system, probably glibc-based.
>>
>> Ok.
>>
>>>> Compilation on Solaris 11 x86, 32 and 64 bit work fine with
>>>> Oracle Studio 12.4.
>>>>
>>>> On Solaris 11 Sparc with Oracle Studio 12.4 it works for 32 bit,
>>>> for 64 bit I get an error in the testsuite:
>>>>
>>>>> FAIL: test-timespec
>>>>> ===================
>>>>>
>>>>> test-timespec.c:138: assertion 'cmp (a, b) == sign (i - j)' failed
>>>>> FAIL test-timespec (exit status: 262)
>>>
>>> This one is interesting.
>>> It would be great if you could get in with a debugger to see what
>>> exactly is going wrong.
>>> It's probably not an issue for diffutils, as it barely uses timespec
>>> at all and does not use timespec_sub.
>>
>> I didn’t get into looking into that yet, sorry.
>>
>>>> On Solaris 9 Sparc with GCC 4.6 I still get this, probably because the
>>>> change you proposed in not in the release tarball. I’d happily test if the
>>>> updated tarballs are bootstrapped:
>>>>
>>>>>  CC       error.o
>>>>> error.c:112:1: error: function declaration isn't a prototype 
>>>>> [-Werror=strict-prototypes]
>>>
>>> This appears to be exposing some unusually old code in error.c that
>>> should instead be relying on gnulib's own strerror_r module.
>>> We'll probably fix it properly in the long run, but simply not using
>>> --enable-gcc-warnings will avoid it for you now.
>>
>> Ok.
>>
>>>> I would like to set up buildbot, to which repository? The one at Savannah?
>>>> Do you have a preferred branch?
>>>>  git://git.savannah.gnu.org/diffutils.git
>>>
>>> A buildbot would be great!
>>> That is indeed the right repository, and as for branch, please use "master".
>>
>> This is now set up:
>>   https://buildfarm.opencsw.org/buildbot/waterfall?tag=diffutils
>>
>> I will add more build options, compilers and platforms sometime.
>>
>> I can also configure sending automatic emails if a build breaks, which 
>> destination
>> address would you prefer?
>
> Great!
> Will get back to you shortly with an address. It'll probably be a new
> mailing list.

Hi Dagobert,
I've just created a new mailing list: address@hidden
Please use that for your new cibiuld tool, assuming it will not spam
the list too much, of course.

This new list is mainly to have a forum in which to discuss
development without incurring the administrative cost of an
auto-created debbugs ticket per thread. Of course, if you have a bug,
or a patch for which issue tracking is a good idea, please continue to
use the bug-diffutils mailing list.

Note that I'll post announcements to the new list from now on, not to
the bug-diffutils list.