[bug-diffutils] bug#24116: bug#24116: [platform-testers] new snapshot available: diffutils-3.3.50-0353

[Harald van Dijk]

On 05/08/2016 18:21, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 08/05/2016 07:13 AM, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> > Unfortunately, POSIX currently requires the export command to not have
> > any magic quoting, and any POSIX-conforming shell will make
> >
> >     a="b c=d"
> >     export a=$a
> >
> > set a to b, and c to d. Not so with bash, but that's because bash simply
> > isn't POSIX-conforming, even if invoked as sh.
>
> Not quite so fast.
>
> > POSIX will require special quoting rules for the export command in the
> > future, similar to what bash does today. When it does, dash is likely to
> > change to match that, and the local command will likely be changed to
> > work the same way.
>
> POSIX has already issued an interpretation request, and therefore, any
> CURRENT implementations (including bash) that already behave as
> permitted by the interpretation ARE conforming. [...]

> http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=351

An interpretation request doesn't automatically mean that all current 
implementations are conforming, does it? It only means that when the 
interpretation response says so. In this case, the response says that 
the standard does not allow bash/ksh's behaviour.

http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=351#c865:

> Interpretation response
> ------------------------
> The standard states that the current behavior of ksh93 does not conform, and 
> conforming implementations must conform to this. However, concerns have been 
> raised about this which are being referred to the sponsor.

The fact that this is seen as a defect in the standard which will be 
fixed, rather than a defect in bash/ksh, doesn't make bash/ksh conform, 
it merely means that bash/ksh shouldn't be changed to conform.