[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-diffutils] Bug#648411: diffutils: description of -I option is w
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-diffutils] Bug#648411: diffutils: description of -I option is wrong (fwd) |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Mar 2012 06:45:13 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1 |
On 03/04/2012 02:24 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Thanks, I applied this to the diffutils master branch:
>
>>From a96c4da999cc1704146ea0eb7ba86c6dbbea1cad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 13:19:55 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] doc: explain -I RE better in --help output
>
> * src/diff.c, src/sdiff.c (option_help_msgid): For -I RE,
> change "whose lines all match" to "all whose lines match" to avoid
> unintended interpretation. Reported by Danijel Tasov in
> <http://bugs.debian.org/648411>.
> ---
> src/diff.c | 2 +-
> src/sdiff.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/diff.c b/src/diff.c
> index 200112b..85950fa 100644
> --- a/src/diff.c
> +++ b/src/diff.c
> @@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ static char const * const option_help_msgid[] = {
> N_("-b, --ignore-space-change ignore changes in the amount of white
> space"),
> N_("-w, --ignore-all-space ignore all white space"),
> N_("-B, --ignore-blank-lines ignore changes whose lines are all
> blank"),
> - N_("-I, --ignore-matching-lines=RE ignore changes whose lines all match
> RE"),
> + N_("-I, --ignore-matching-lines=RE ignore changes all whose lines match
> RE"),
That still reads awkwardly to me. Would this be any better:
ignore changes where all lines match RE
--
Eric Blake address@hidden +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature