[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug-diffutils] Does patch ignore Linux ACLs?
From: |
Thomas Keller |
Subject: |
[bug-diffutils] Does patch ignore Linux ACLs? |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:39:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100714 SUSE/3.0.6 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.6 |
Hi!
I stumbled upon this several times, but last time I was bitten a bit
hard. My umask on some server creates no world-readable files, but this
should actually not be a problem when ACLs are in place which inherit
permissions from default rules for certain users and groups, right?
I was quite astouned that patch(1) however ignored these default ACLs
when it created new files form a patch it received from STDIN. Is this
expected behaviour or considered a bug?
Thanks in advance for enlightening answers,
Thomas.
--
GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | address@hidden | http://thomaskeller.biz
Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information
on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period
of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [bug-diffutils] Does patch ignore Linux ACLs?,
Thomas Keller <=