Re: [Bug-dejagnu] Re: AM33/2.0 support for mn10300-elf

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Jul 16, 2003, Rob Savoye <address@hidden> wrote:

>   Well, the compiler name *should* really be gotten by transforming the
> target name

Yup.

> but I assume there was some reason for hardcoding it?

I've no idea :-(

> It looks like am33_2.0-linux-gnu isn't a standard
> target-triplet. What does config.guess return on this target?

Err...  I'm not sure config.guess supports it at all (we have mostly
only cross-built to it), but config.sub (as in ftp.gnu.org)
recognizes am33_2.0-unkwnon-linux-gnu as a canonical form.

>   As I'm guessing almost nobody uses this target, I'll check this into
> Savannah 'as is".

Thanks.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                 address@hidden, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        address@hidden, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer