[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: nanosleep.c & winsock.h (was Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Bran
From: |
Shaun Tancheff |
Subject: |
RE: nanosleep.c & winsock.h (was Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch) |
Date: |
Thu, 13 May 2004 16:50:02 -0500 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Conrad T. Pino [mailto:Conrad@Pino.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:36 PM
> To: Shaun Tancheff; 'Derek Robert Price'
> Cc: 'Bug CVS'
> Subject: RE: nanosleep.c & winsock.h (was Re: Windows Build
> Broken - Feature Branch)
>
>
> Hi Shaun,
>
> > From: Shaun Tancheff
> >
> > Why not something simple?
>
> If only it were *just* a technical issue.
>
> IMO we're discussing "stated direction" and
> "coding policy" issues with respect to POSIX
> standards as applied to CVS cose basd.
IMO the attempt to stay 'as true to posix as possible' is admirable,
but a bit misguided when it comes down to abusing select() to act as a
high resolution timer .... The select() in winsock is there only to be
compatable with BSD sockets interface.
I doubt very much that windows will ever get a high resolution timer and
if it does it won't be used by winsock/select() because *sockets* don't
*need* high resolutions timers and select() on windows isn't good for
anything else (unlike *nix).
> Aesthetic questions really and when it come
> to art, what is *good* taste?
>
> Conrad
>
- RE: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch, (continued)
- RE: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch, Conrad T. Pino, 2004/05/13
- nanosleep.c & winsock.h (was Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch), Derek Robert Price, 2004/05/13
- RE: nanosleep.c & winsock.h (was Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch), Conrad T. Pino, 2004/05/13
- Re: nanosleep.c & winsock.h (was Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch), Derek Robert Price, 2004/05/13
- RE: nanosleep.c & winsock.h (was Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch), Shaun Tancheff, 2004/05/13
- RE: nanosleep.c & winsock.h (was Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch), Conrad T. Pino, 2004/05/13
- RE: nanosleep.c & winsock.h (was Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch),
Shaun Tancheff <=
- RE: nanosleep.c & winsock.h (was Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch), Conrad T. Pino, 2004/05/13
- Re: nanosleep.c & winsock.h (was Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch), Derek Robert Price, 2004/05/13
- RE: nanosleep.c & winsock.h (was Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch), Conrad T. Pino, 2004/05/14
- Re: nanosleep.c & winsock.h (was Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch), Derek Robert Price, 2004/05/14
- RE: nanosleep.c & winsock.h (was Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch), Conrad T. Pino, 2004/05/14
- Re: nanosleep.c & winsock.h (was Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch), Derek Robert Price, 2004/05/14
- RE: nanosleep.c & winsock.h (was Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch), Conrad T. Pino, 2004/05/13
RE: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch, Conrad T. Pino, 2004/05/12
Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch, Dennis Jones, 2004/05/10