RE: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch

[Conrad T. Pino]

Hi Derek,

> From: Derek Robert Price
> 
> Hopefully.  Occassionally, when Windows is involved, they say
> something along the lines of "do it yourself", but mostly they try to
> support it.  We'll probably get  the nanosleep since it really just
> requires <winsock.h> or, alternatively, a declaration of select() &
> timeval in nanosleep.c.

Looks like we have a solution for "nanosleep".

How do you want divide the work?

> If we get the gettime, I suspect it will involve more standards (C89,
> C99, POSIX, etc.) than your suggestion.  If you'd like to research
> whether Windows made any concessions in that department to any of the
> various standards, you might be able to speed things up.  Keeping in
> mind, of course, that the GNULIB folks know quite a bit more about
> standards and portability than I and still often take off in
> directions I didn't expect.  :)

Jim Hyslop is the only other respondent to the "gettime" inquiry.  Is
Jim on the CVS Project, GNULib Project or both?

Any interest in a temporary hack until a better solution appears?

> Derek

Conrad