[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fwd: Re: co -d, modules -d, & Emptydir]
|
From: |
Derek Robert Price |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Fwd: Re: co -d, modules -d, & Emptydir] |
|
Date: |
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:06:22 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mark D. Baushke wrote:
> I have a slight bias towards accepting this enhancement. However, I
> would like to hear what others think of it.
Since Larry, Mark, and I now appear to mostly agree that this patch
would be a move towards simplified code and consistent behavior, this
brings up a secondary question: Would this be appropriate for stable?
I was leaning towards feature originally since it does involve a
behavior change even if it is towards consistency and simplifies the
source, but the more I have thought about it the more it seems to me to
be a valid stable fix.
Derek
- --
*8^)
Email: derek@ximbiot.com
Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFANlqtLD1OTBfyMaQRAnULAKCcjiPlphJQcs1NH4KgkvamgGi7ZgCgkfVa
/B/DpzTrLIPG6s2sXPg3sM8=
=CxrA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----