[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dependency problem?
From: |
Larry Jones |
Subject: |
Re: Dependency problem? |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Jul 2003 15:50:29 -0400 (EDT) |
Andrew Moise writes:
>
> cvs_DEPENDENCIES = $(cvs_client_objects)
>
> (... uh-huh ...)
No, that's not correct. It should be something like:
cvs_DEPENDENCIES = ../diff/libdiff.a ../lib/libcvs.a $(ZLIB_LIBS)
This seems to work correctly on the cvs1-11-x-branch (which is what I
was looking at) but be broken on the trunk. Removing the definition
from Makefile.am and letting automake generate it itself seems to do the
trick.
> That's a sensible approach, yes. The patch I sent is the wrong
> thing (TM), since it adds a bit of special-case nonsense to the diff
> code, but as I said I don't have a sufficient understanding of the code
> to remove the newline-addition hackery, and the current behavior is
> definitely problematic.
> The problem _is_ specific to cvs; diff is not affected.
Then I misunderstood, I thought it was a generic diff bug that was
manifested in CVS.
-Larry Jones
What a stupid world. -- Calvin