[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch)
|
From: |
Larry Jones |
|
Subject: |
Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch) |
|
Date: |
Fri, 9 May 2003 16:12:54 -0400 (EDT) |
Rob Lanphier writes:
>
> We're longtime CVS users, and in general, we're very happy with it.
> However, there is one feature that has long annoyed us. We wish the
> "-l" switch didn't exist, which allows any user to suppress logging.
Why? What's in the history file that you can't live without? If you
want guaranteed logging, you can always use loginfo and friends.
-Larry Jones
Nothing spoils fun like finding out it builds character. -- Calvin
- Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch), Rob Lanphier, 2003/05/09
- Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch),
Larry Jones <=
- Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch), Rob Lanphier, 2003/05/09
- Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch), Larry Jones, 2003/05/09
- Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch), Brian Lenihan, 2003/05/10
- Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch), Derek Robert Price, 2003/05/29
- Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch), Larry Jones, 2003/05/29
- Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch), Derek Robert Price, 2003/05/29
- Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch), Larry Jones, 2003/05/29
- Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch), Derek Robert Price, 2003/05/29
- Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch), Duncan Howard, 2003/05/29
- Message not available
- Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch), Paul Edwards, 2003/05/29