[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PAM authentication patch - v2
From: |
Max Bowsher |
Subject: |
Re: PAM authentication patch - v2 |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 17:07:50 +0100 |
Brian Murphy wrote:
>> +@example
>> +cvs auth required pam_unix.so
>> +cvs account required pam_unix.so
>> +@end example
>> +
>> +The the equivalent @file{/etc/pam.d/cvs} would contain
What was the consensus about hardcoding "cvs" or using the name cvs was
invoked with as the PAM id?
If the latter, maybe a note about that here?
I can see it possibly confusing people a *lot*.
Max.
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, (continued)
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Mark D. Baushke, 2003/04/17
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Derek Robert Price, 2003/04/18
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Brian Murphy, 2003/04/20
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Mark D. Baushke, 2003/04/20
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Brian Murphy, 2003/04/27
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Mark D. Baushke, 2003/04/28
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Brian Murphy, 2003/04/28
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Derek Robert Price, 2003/04/29
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2,
Max Bowsher <=
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Mark D. Baushke, 2003/04/17
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Larry Jones, 2003/04/16
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Max Bowsher, 2003/04/17
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Brian Murphy, 2003/04/18
Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Brian Murphy, 2003/04/15