[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using Automake
From: |
Derek R. Price |
Subject: |
Re: Using Automake |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Dec 2000 18:02:21 -0500 |
Karl Fogel wrote:
> "Derek R. Price" <derek.price@openavenue.com> writes:
> > Anyone gonna attempt to kick my virtual butt for converting CVS to use
> > Automake and checking the results in? I've been using the conversion
[snip]
> Sounds good to me. I guess it means developers will need automake
> installed, but they already needed the autoconf suite anyway.
Yep. I relied on some of the changes in the development version of Automake
and added a few patches myself. I posted RPMs and source at:
http://alumni.engin.umich.edu/~oberon/automake-1.4a-0_CVSHome_org_7.noarch.rpm
http://alumni.engin.umich.edu/~oberon/automake-1.4a-0_CVSHome_org_7.src.rpm
http://alumni.engin.umich.edu/~oberon/automake-1.4a-0_CVSHome_org_7.tar.gz
The source RPMs keep my patches separate from the dev version of Automake.
> Does the doc target still work right (i.e., independently of the
> software build)?
Mostly. info files are being generated as part of a software build, but
only when out of date. Not sure if this is important.
> > Part of my motive here is to see the code pass muster on Larry's test
> > machines and the changes can always be backed out...
>
> Yeah. Tag first, I guess. :-)
preautomakeconversion & postautomakeconversion
Checked in.
Derek
--
Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect ( http://CVSHome.org )
mailto:dprice@openavenue.com OpenAvenue ( http://OpenAvenue.com )
--
Death to all fanatics!