bug#59821: 9.1: du Aborted (corrupt filesystem)

[Luke Dashjr]

On Monday 05 December 2022 08:39:11 Sam James wrote:
> > On 4 Dec 2022, at 18:07, Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
> >
> > Version: sys-apps/coreutils-9.1-r1 (Gentoo)
> >
> > Context: Linux has a long-standing bug which leads to ext4 RAM dishs
> > (zram specifically) getting corrupted randomly. This manifests as various
> > newfstatat calls returning -1 errno=EUCLEAN (Structure needs cleaning).
> >
> > The `du` tool, when it encounters them, prints an error as expected, but
> > later on aborts at:
> > #4  0x00007ffff7d4d3dc in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79
> > #5  0x000000010000ba08 in leave_dir (fts=fts@entry=0x100042680,
> > ent=ent@entry=0x100071630)
> >    at lib/fts-cycle.c:136
> > #6  0x000000010000bd00 in fts_build (sp=sp@entry=0x100042680,
> > type=type@entry=3) at lib/fts.c:1326
> > #7  0x000000010000ce7c in rpl_fts_read (sp=0x100042680) at lib/fts.c:925
> > #8  0x0000000100004864 in du_files (files=<optimized out>,
> > bit_flags=<optimized out>) at src/du.c:691
> > #9  0x0000000100005cfc in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized
> > out>) at src/du.c:1123
> >
> > (I am not certain if the fstatat return value is related to the later
> > abort, because I couldn't find a way to get gdb to break only when
> > fstatat returns nonzero)
>
> I may well be missing something, but shouldn't you be reporting this to the
> kernel folks instead?

Did that in February: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215557

> Or are you saying you want du to give you a nicer error message?

I would like du to continue doing what it's doing, so I can still find the 
larger directories. :)

Luke