bug#32796: please consider using renameat2 from glibc if available

[Johannes Schauer]

Quoting Paul Eggert (2018-10-07 22:14:11)
> Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > Which other tests should I perform?
> I'd like to see a test using glibc without a fake root, as that's the most
> common way this code will be used.

Which test result would you like to see?

I have coreutils with that patch running on my system and in the chroot and mv
seems to be working fine as far as I can see.

signature.asc
Description: signature