bug-coreutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#28082: bash: /bin/rm: Argument list too long


From: R0b0t1
Subject: bug#28082: bash: /bin/rm: Argument list too long
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 22:12:59 -0500

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Jonny Grant <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> On 15/08/17 12:45, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 08:19:13AM +0100, Jonny Grant wrote:
>>>
>>> On 15/08/17 00:50, Paul Eggert wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Jonny Grant wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> do you know which kernel API has this limitation?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> All kernels have a limitation there to some extent, except perhaps the
>>>> Hurd. Sorry, I don't know what the limits are.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ok thank you.
>>>
>>> I imagine kernels just need a dynamic API, so it doesn't need to be a
>>> fixed buffer.
>>
>>
>> It's a security limit rather than a fixed buffer, see e.g.
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=da029c11e6b12f321f36dac8771e833b65cec962
>
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> My Ubuntu 16.04 limit is 2MB it seems:
> $ getconf ARG_MAX
> 2097152
>
>
> This laptop has 16GB RAM, so it is a shame it isn't much bigger, or dynamic
> so can be expanded when needed somehow. Those mapped pages of RAM wouldn't
> be wasted, as just VM right?
>
> I imagine a lot of people may have 60,000 files in a directory like me these
> days. Latest Linux kernel just added support for billions of files per
> directory I read.
>

If this is a strict requirement, you could switch to Hurd. I checked
with a Hurd developer(?) some time ago and one of their design
philosophies is no artificial limits.

I wasn't able to find an actual citation for this behavior, sadly.

R0b0t1.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]