[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#23110: seq apparent bug
From: |
Bernhard Voelker |
Subject: |
bug#23110: seq apparent bug |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Apr 2016 19:19:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 |
On 04/14/2016 06:47 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> The 2 patches look good.
thanks for the review, pushed.
> On 14/04/16 17:37, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
>>>> seq 1 .0000000000000000000000000000001 1
>> I consider this a bug in seq: from mathematical point of view, the above
>> should just output "1" and then exit, because after adding that tiny number
>> the next number would be greater than LAST.
>
> right
>
>> IMO we should enhance seq_fast() to do all the Math when no special
>> output format is given.
>> WDYT?
>
> It would be good to expand seq_fast to more cases.
I'll try to come up with something (which may take some time).
Have a nice day,
Berny
- bug#23110: seq apparent bug, (continued)
- bug#23110: seq apparent bug, Ruediger Meier, 2016/04/07
- bug#23110: seq apparent bug, Bernhard Voelker, 2016/04/07
- bug#23110: seq apparent bug, Pádraig Brady, 2016/04/08
- bug#23110: seq apparent bug, Paul Eggert, 2016/04/08
- bug#23110: seq apparent bug, Ruediger Meier, 2016/04/08
- bug#23110: seq apparent bug, Paul Eggert, 2016/04/08
- bug#23110: seq apparent bug, Ruediger Meier, 2016/04/09
- bug#23110: seq apparent bug, Bernhard Voelker, 2016/04/09
- Message not available
- bug#23110: seq apparent bug, Bernhard Voelker, 2016/04/14
- bug#23110: seq apparent bug, Pádraig Brady, 2016/04/14
- bug#23110: seq apparent bug,
Bernhard Voelker <=