[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#23214: Possible bug in sort -g
From: |
Matthijs Nescio |
Subject: |
bug#23214: Possible bug in sort -g |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Apr 2016 13:46:46 +0200 |
Hi,
I seem to have detected a bug in sort. Can you confirm?
~ $
~ $ sort --version
sort (GNU coreutils) 8.4
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>.
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
Written by Mike Haertel and Paul Eggert.
~ $ cat test.txt | sort -g
2e-1
2e-1
2e-1
2e-1
1.0e-1
1.0e-2
1.0e-2
1.0e-3
1.0e-4
2.0e-1
2.0e-2
2.0e-2
2.0e-2
2.0e-2
3.0e-2
3.0e-2
3.0e-2
3.0e-2
3.0e-2
3.0e-2
15
2e+1
2e+1
2e+1
2e+1
115
119
150
2e+2
2e+2
2e+2
2e+2
2e+3
2e+3
2e+3
2e+3
~ $ cat test.txt
3.0e-2
1.0e-4
2.0e-2
3.0e-2
1.0e-1
2.0e-1
3.0e-2
1.0e-2
2.0e-2
3.0e-2
1.0e-2
2.0e-2
3.0e-2
1.0e-3
2.0e-2
3.0e-2
15
119
115
150
2e+1
2e-1
2e+3
2e+2
2e+1
2e-1
2e+3
2e+2
2e+1
2e-1
2e+3
2e+2
2e+1
2e-1
2e+3
2e+2
~ $
I think this result is never what anybody would expect; 2e-1 is larger than
1.0e-1 and 1.0e-4 is smaller than 1.0e-1.
The above is running on Ubuntu 14.04. On a Cygwin installation the result is
fine.
Thank you, kind regards, Matthijs.
- bug#23214: Possible bug in sort -g,
Matthijs Nescio <=