[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#20029: 'yes' surprisingly slow
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
Subject: |
bug#20029: 'yes' surprisingly slow |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 23:59:16 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 |
On 10/03/15 21:18, Ole Tange wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Giuseppe Scrivano <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> $ time src/yes `echo {1..2000}` | head -c 2000M | md5sum
>> 55c293324aa6ecce14f0bf30da5a4686 -
>>
>> real 0m7.994s
>> user 0m11.093s
>> sys 0m2.953s
>>
>> versus (with the patch):
>>
>> $ time src/yes `echo {1..2000}` | head -c 2000M | md5sum
>> 55c293324aa6ecce14f0bf30da5a4686 -
>>
>> real 0m3.534s
>> user 0m4.164s
>> sys 0m1.803s
>
> Are you sure your are not limited by md5sum?
>
> $ time yes "`echo {1..2000}`" | head -c 2000M >/dev/null
>
> real 0m0.660s
> user 0m0.180s
> sys 0m1.115s
>
> The solution should perform no worse than that.
Two separate cases. Yours above is a single large argument.
Giuseppe's example above, and your original problematic example
were without quotes, and so with many arguments passed to yes.
I've applied Giuseppe's patch with an augmented test.
cheers,
Pádraig.