[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#14189: ls -d bug ??
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
bug#14189: ls -d bug ?? |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:20:03 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4 |
On 04/11/13 11:17, address@hidden wrote:
> Is there
> some reason it can't give me what (it appears) the manual says (and what makes
> sense) it should?
Sounds like there's a bug in the manual; it shouldn't say that
"ls -d" outputs only directories. Can you please mention
the wording you're talking about?
To get something like what you want, you can use this command:
ls -d */
or maybe:
ls -d */ .*/
bug#14189: ls -d bug ??,
Paul Eggert <=