bug#12194: Can you fix this bug?

[Eric Blake]

retitle 12194 ls -L question
tag 12194 notabug
thanks

On 08/13/2012 01:39 PM, Overdorf, Sam wrote:
> When I run the command "ls -L file-name" I expect it to show me the name of 
> the file the link is pointing at.
> I currently just returns the link name.

Thanks for the report.  However, this behavior is required by POSIX:

http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/ls.html

-L
    Evaluate the file information and file type for all symbolic links
(whether named on the command line or encountered in a file hierarchy)
to be those of the file referenced by the link, and not the link itself;
however, ls shall write the name of the link itself and not the file
referenced by the link. When -L is used with -l, write the contents of
symbolic links in the long format (see the STDOUT section).

> 
> This seems to have been broken for a while.

No, it's not broken.

> 
> ls (coreutils) 5.2.1

That's old.  The latest version is 8.18.  While this particular issue is
not a bug, there have been other bugs fixed in ls in the meantime, so
you might want to consider upgrading.

I'm closing this bug, although you are still free to add further comments.

-- 
Eric Blake   address@hidden    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature