[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#11675: stty bad C semantics
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
bug#11675: stty bad C semantics |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:41:21 +0200 |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 06/12/2012 07:33 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Here's a way to solve the problem that doesn't require restoring
>> the memset calls. It feels slightly hackish
>
> But it's hackish in a good way! It's a bit faster
> and smaller and more portable than the existing code,
> and it's faster and smaller than all the other proposed
> fixes. It's clearly the best idea yet. Thanks for
> cutting the Gordian knot.
Thanks. With that, I've pushed it and marked this as done.
- bug#11675: stty bad C semantics, (continued)
bug#11675: stty bad C semantics, Jim Meyering, 2012/06/12