bug-coreutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#10317: PING - bug#10317: patch to su: -l and -p should not be used t


From: Rocky Bernstein
Subject: bug#10317: PING - bug#10317: patch to su: -l and -p should not be used together
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 10:20:35 -0400

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Jim Meyering <address@hidden> wrote:

> Rocky Bernstein wrote:
> > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Jim Meyering <address@hidden> wrote:
> ...
> >     Please don't interpret my review delays or my misreading your
> >     patch as anything deliberately unfriendly.
> >
> > I didn't say deliberately unfriendly. I said there was an unfriendly
> environment
> > . No doubt, it is unintentional. But for me, for this, it is there. More
> below.
> >
> >      I've been trying to keep
> >     this list as open/accommodating as possible for nearly two decades.
> >     I agree that the long delay is off-putting and apologized for that,
> twice.
> >
> > Understood and accepted. But really there is not much to show that this
> has
> > moved forward in the 5 months. Well, okay, for 5 months of time, you
> have now at
> > least tried the patch.
> >
> > So perhaps for the delays, you or someone reading could make the
> stylistic
> > changes that would take, what, maybe a few minutes? I promise in the
> future with
> > respect to coreutils I will follow coreutils conventions more carefully.
> But is
> > this about me getting following coreutils conventions or is this about
> getting a
> > "su" problem solved? Right now, if feels like the former, hence
> "unfriendly
> > environment".
> >
> > Also if you had taken the few minutes to make the stylistic changes, you
> would
> > have known that things would be properly and it would show that this you
> have
> > some interest in seeing things improved. Deeds sometimes speak volumes
> more than
> > apologies.
>
> Um... You seem to have misread.
> I did indeed make all of the stylistic adjustments I listed.
> I even added a commit log for you and included the output of
> "git format-patch" (the "change-set" I mentioned) including
> your patch *with those stylistic changes*, so that you could
> use that as a basis for any additional changes.
>

Ok - my bad. Thanks.


>
> >     > I suggest, but leave up to you, whether
> >     > to just document the behavior as it is leaving the code exactly as
> it is.
> >     >
> >     >     starting from the change-set below, which includes the
> following
> >     changes:
> >     >
> >     >      - remove some space-before-TAB in tests/Makefile.am
> >     >      - remove space-before-semicolon in su.c
> >     >      - split two longer-than-80-col lines
> >     >      - remove both \n and trailing "." from two new diagnostics
> >     >      - adjust NEWS
>


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]