[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#8676: ls --si --human-readable, MB vs M
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
bug#8676: ls --si --human-readable, MB vs M |
Date: |
Mon, 16 May 2011 09:23:23 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
On 05/16/11 01:48, Peggy Russell wrote:
> Shouldn't the `ls -l --si` output (#2 or #4) be display as 60MB vs 60M
That would be more consistent, yes. But it would also take up an extra
column of output, and those columns are precious.