[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Suggestion for rm(1)
From: |
Voelker, Bernhard |
Subject: |
RE: Suggestion for rm(1) |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:03:09 +0100 |
Eric Blake wrote:
> Note that if you use rm to remove a file, it might be possible to
> recover the contents of that file, given sufficient expertise and/or
> time. If you want more assurance that the contents are truly
> unrecoverable, consider using shred.
+1
Have a nice day,
Berny
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), (continued)
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Pádraig Brady, 2010/03/10
- RE: Suggestion for rm(1), Voelker, Bernhard, 2010/03/10
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Reuben Thomas, 2010/03/10
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), C de-Avillez, 2010/03/10
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Reuben Thomas, 2010/03/10
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Keisial, 2010/03/10
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Reuben Thomas, 2010/03/10
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Keisial, 2010/03/10
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Reuben Thomas, 2010/03/10
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Eric Blake, 2010/03/10
- RE: Suggestion for rm(1),
Voelker, Bernhard <=
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Keisial, 2010/03/11
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Eric Blake, 2010/03/11
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Reuben Thomas, 2010/03/12
- [PATCH] rm: tweak wording about loss of data warning, Eric Blake, 2010/03/17
- Re: [PATCH] rm: tweak wording about loss of data warning, Eric Blake, 2010/03/18
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Bob Proulx, 2010/03/11
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Bob Proulx, 2010/03/10
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Andreas Schwab, 2010/03/11
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Bob Proulx, 2010/03/11
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Phillip Susi, 2010/03/11