bug-coreutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils


From: C de-Avillez
Subject: Re: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:55:40 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8pre) Gecko/20100107 Shredder/3.0.1pre

On 01/07/10 15:36, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Does it really belong in coreutils installed on every computer in the
> known universe?  I don't think my GNU toaster needs it.  So I would
> vote against putting it in coreutils.  It would be fine in a different
> project package however.  This doesn't feel like a coreutils program.
> More like a dev-utils program.
>   

Well, most of the times I am at a customer, I am working on their
production machines (or User Acceptance Testing, or QA), trying to fix
something on their environment -- and these as usually as far as
possible from dev tools. Sometimes I do get to do development, and then
I have the time to set it up, if needed.

Finding out an errno in production is as important as on development,
and they do happen. Making this a dev-utils thingie will very much
guarantee I will *never* see it in prod/QA/UAT.

So, yes, I think this would make sense to belong to coreutils (from my
own quite biased view, of course)

..C..

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]