Re: Linus' sha1 is much faster!

[Linus Torvalds]

On Sat, 15 Aug 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> That said, I don't know if the MPL is ok for X11. I've not looked at 
> compatibility issues with MPL. For git, we could just ignore the MPL, 
> since the GPLv2 was acceptable regardless of it.

If MPL isn't ok for X11, then we'd need to make sure that even the 
silliest Mozilla crud has been rewritten. There really isn't much, but 
hey, the _history_ is based on the mozilla code, and who knows - the 
'blk_SHA_CTX' struct has things like the fields in the same order as the 
Mozilla equivalent, for all those historical reasons.

(Heh. Looking at that, I probably should move the 'size' field first, 
since that would have different alignment rules, and the struct would be 
more tightly packed that way, and initialize better).

Afaik, none of the actual code remains (the mozilla SHA1 thing did the 
wrong thing for performance even for just the final bytes, and did those a 
byte at a time etc, so I rewrote even the trivial SHA1_Final parts).

Of course, maybe the Mozilla people would be interested in taking my 
faster version, and say that the new-BSD license is ok, and make everybody 
happy. The only listed author for the Mozilla SHA1 is Paul Kocher. I added 
him to the Cc.

Paul, for your information, we're talking about a faster rewritten "mostly 
portable" SHA1 routines that you can find at

        http://git.kernel.org/?p=git/git.git;a=tree;f=block-sha1;hb=pu

(follow the "blob" pointers to see sha1.c and sha1.h). I don't know if 
you're active with Mozilla/Firefox or whether you even care, but you seem 
to be the logical choice of person to ask.

                        Linus