Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon

[Eric Blake]

Eric Blake <ebb9 <at> byu.net> writes:

> > The test is still running.

The final list of failures on cygwin 1.7 (I'll need to investigate further, and 
still want to rerun this under pristine conditions.  I'm not even going to 
bother running this under cygwin 1.5.x):

FAIL: misc/invalid-opt
FAIL: rm/cycle
FAIL: chmod/no-x
FAIL: rm/isatty
FAIL: rm/fail-eacces
FAIL: rm/fail-eperm
FAIL: rm/inaccessible
FAIL: rm/rm1
FAIL: rm/rm2
FAIL: rm/rm3
FAIL: rm/unread2
FAIL: rm/unreadable
FAIL: chgrp/no-x
FAIL: misc/ls-misc
FAIL: misc/factor
FAIL: misc/paste
FAIL: misc/printf
FAIL: misc/pwd-long
FAIL: misc/shred-remove
FAIL: misc/sort-compress
FAIL: misc/stdbuf
FAIL: cp/existing-perm-race
FAIL: cp/fail-perm
FAIL: dd/direct
FAIL: du/inacc-dest
FAIL: du/inacc-dir
FAIL: du/no-x
FAIL: install/basic-1
FAIL: ls/stat-failed
FAIL: mkdir/p-3
FAIL: mv/hard-3
FAIL: mv/i-2
FAIL: mv/i-3
FAIL: mv/perm-1
FAIL: mv/trailing-slash
FAIL: readlink/can-e
FAIL: readlink/can-f
FAIL: readlink/can-m
====================
All 381 tests passed
====================

Hmm.  There appears to be some sort of bug in how parallel-tests is calculating 
success, since this claimed that all tests passed even though there are failing 
and skipped logs.  I don't know if the bug is in automake or in coreutils.

-- 
Eric Blake