[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sc_tight_scope on cygwin
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: sc_tight_scope on cygwin |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Mar 2009 06:33:00 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090302 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
According to Jim Meyering on 3/27/2009 1:13 AM:
>> Nope. Cygwin doesn't use glibc, so 'info libc' fails to turn up anything
>> at all. Do you have a preferred way to skip this test on non-Linux
>> platforms, since glibc's info manual is unlikely to appear on any other
>> system?
>
> If the test is skipped, it'd be nice to emit a warning,
> so that if it happens to me because I forgot to install
> glibc's documentation on a Linux system, I'll notice it.
I'll see what I can think of. It doesn't help that with texinfo-4.13
there is a core dump when attempting to open pages that don't exist:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-03/msg00974.html
>>> nm -e *.$(OBJEXT) \
>>> | sed -n 's/.* T //p' \
>>> + | sed 's/^_//' \
>> Indeed, this approach worked for me. Is it worth trying to combine the
>> two sed invocations into one, or should I just go ahead and commit with
>> this style?
>
> This style is fine by me.
Pushed.
- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAknMx3oACgkQ84KuGfSFAYB1WgCgllrm423l14oLxp0m+4+190GA
IJAAn1ts+43SU+MkmmfV95bunrwpayIF
=GzNB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----