[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: stat signed/unsigned
From: |
Michael Meskes |
Subject: |
Re: stat signed/unsigned |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Jan 2009 17:58:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 05:08:43PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Have you seen ever stat print a negative number
> corresponding to that field? Actually, I'll bet that
Yes, that's what caused my email. :-)
> *has* happened... and considering the semantics
> of that variable, I see no reason to print a signed value.
Agreed.
> So this patch has your name/email on it.
> Tell me those are ok and I'll push it.
Fine with me. Thanks.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: address@hidden
Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
- Re: stat signed/unsigned, Michael Meskes, 2009/01/02
- Re: stat signed/unsigned, Jim Meyering, 2009/01/02
- Re: stat signed/unsigned,
Michael Meskes <=
- Re: stat signed/unsigned, Pádraig Brady, 2009/01/06
- Re: stat signed/unsigned, Jim Meyering, 2009/01/06
- Re: stat signed/unsigned, Pádraig Brady, 2009/01/06
- Re: stat signed/unsigned, Jim Meyering, 2009/01/06
- Re: stat signed/unsigned, Pádraig Brady, 2009/01/07
- Re: stat signed/unsigned, Paul Eggert, 2009/01/08
- Re: stat signed/unsigned, Pádraig Brady, 2009/01/09
- Re: stat signed/unsigned, Pádraig Brady, 2009/01/15
- Re: stat signed/unsigned, Jim Meyering, 2009/01/16
- Re: stat signed/unsigned, Pádraig Brady, 2009/01/16