[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Should "df --portability" allow thousands separators?
From: |
Peter D. |
Subject: |
Should "df --portability" allow thousands separators? |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Feb 2007 00:10:18 +1100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.4 |
Hi,
I apologize if this is a silly question...
The man pages for df state that "-P" or "--portability" should, "use the
POSIX output format". I admit that I am ignorant and do not know whether
or not POSIX allows for thousands separators - but I suspect that they are
a recent innovation that post dates POSIX.
I have an environment variable set that triggers thousands separators. It
can be overridden with an extra command line option, but I suspect that
a "-P" should be sufficient.
If this isn't really a bug, sorry.
--
sig goes here...
Peter D.
- Should "df --portability" allow thousands separators?,
Peter D. <=
- Re: Should "df --portability" allow thousands separators?, Paul Eggert, 2007/02/25
- Re: Should "df --portability" allow thousands separators?, Peter D., 2007/02/26
- Re: Should "df --portability" allow thousands separators?, Paul Eggert, 2007/02/26
- Re: Should "df --portability" allow thousands separators?, Peter D., 2007/02/26
- Re: Should "df --portability" allow thousands separators?, Jim Meyering, 2007/02/26
- Re: Should "df --portability" allow thousands separators?, Peter D., 2007/02/26
- Re: Should "df --portability" allow thousands separators?, Paul Eggert, 2007/02/27
- Re: Should "df --portability" allow thousands separators?, Jim Meyering, 2007/02/27
- Re: Should "df --portability" allow thousands separators?, Peter D., 2007/02/28
- Re: Should "df --portability" allow thousands separators?, Paul Eggert, 2007/02/28