[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Sort
From: |
mehran.shokouhi |
Subject: |
RE: Sort |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:19:21 +0200 |
Thanks a lot Matthew,
LC_ALL was not set on my computer,
I set it to 'c', and now it is working.
BR,
-- Mehran
-----Original Message-----
From: ext Matthew Woehlke [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 7:41 PM
To: Shokouhi Mehran (Nokia-NET/Tehran)
Subject: RE: Sort
...and telling *me* is not nearly as helpful as telling the list. It WFM
over here. Did you check your locale settings like I suggested?
--
Matthew
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 09:42
To: address@hidden
Subject: RE: Sort
Hi,
My file (x) contains:
104 4
10 5
I run
cat x | sort
I expect to get (' ' < '4')
10 5
104 4
But I get
104 4
10 5
Please note that I want to sort them alphabetically, not numerically.
I tried 'sort -k1,1' and it worked.
BR,
-- Mehran
-----Original Message-----
From: ext Matthew Woehlke [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 2:36 AM
Cc: Shokouhi Mehran (Nokia-NET/Tehran)
Subject: Re: Sort
address@hidden wrote:
> I tried to sort a small file containing the following 2 rows using
> "cat x | sort"
>
> 104 4
> 10 5
>
> But it doesn't work.
That's not a very helpful bug report. What do you get? What did you
expect to get? And did you check your locale settings? ('man sort' talks
about this...)
--
Matthew
"Do you do windows as well?"
"Only when I'm forced to deal with Microsoft..."
-- from a story by Feech
- Sort, mehran.shokouhi, 2007/02/20
- RE: Sort,
mehran.shokouhi <=