Re: xnanosleep range with 32 bit time_t

[Frank v Waveren]

On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 12:33:41AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Can you please report this bug to whoever's responsible for getting
> nanosleep to work in the Linux kernel, if the bug isn't already
> fixed in more bleeding-edge versions?
Works for me (i.e. returns 0) on a stock 2.6.17, but if you could keep
an eye on it once the kernel in debian has reached something like
2.6.17 that would probably be prudent, just to make sure it's not
something introduced by the debian patches. I'd test it on a stock
2.6.8 but I don't have one handy and the interaction between
user-mode-linux host and guest nanosleep is a bit too muddy for me to
trust it for testing this.

-- 
Frank v Waveren                                  Key fingerprint: BDD7 D61E
address@hidden                                              5D39 CF05 4BFC F57A
Public key: hkp://wwwkeys.pgp.net/468D62C8              FA00 7D51 468D 62C8

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature