[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: uniq: missing option -W / --check-fields=N
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: uniq: missing option -W / --check-fields=N |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:29:10 +0200 |
Pádraig Brady <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Yes, that's still a problem.
>> Would you like to work on it?
>
> Hmm looks like that's done already?
> http://www.openi18n.org/subgroups/utildev/dli18npatch2.html
>
> $ cat Pádraig
> Pádraig
> PÁdraig
>
> $ ./i18n-uniq -i < Pádraig
> Pádraig
It's not so simple.
That patch duplicates large chunks of logic,
bloating the resulting code and (more importantly)
making it far less maintainable.
I'm holding out for a clean solution.
- Re: uniq: missing option -W / --check-fields=N, (continued)
- Re: uniq: missing option -W / --check-fields=N, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/22
- Re: uniq: missing option -W / --check-fields=N, Matt Keenan, 2006/06/23
- Re: uniq: missing option -W / --check-fields=N, Pádraig Brady, 2006/06/26
- Re: uniq: missing option -W / --check-fields=N, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/26
- Re: uniq: missing option -W / --check-fields=N, Jim Meyering, 2006/06/26
- Re: uniq: missing option -W / --check-fields=N, Matt Keenan, 2006/06/26
- Re: uniq: missing option -W / --check-fields=N, Jim Meyering, 2006/06/27
- Re: uniq: missing option -W / --check-fields=N, Pádraig Brady, 2006/06/27
- Re: uniq: missing option -W / --check-fields=N, Jim Meyering, 2006/06/27
- Re: uniq: missing option -W / --check-fields=N, Pádraig Brady, 2006/06/27
- Re: uniq: missing option -W / --check-fields=N,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: uniq: missing option -W / --check-fields=N, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/27