[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filutils 4.1
From: |
goesh |
Subject: |
Re: filutils 4.1 |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:53:15 -0600 (MDT) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.5 |
Thanks guys, i appreciate your comments back. I understand that
apparently there are other ways, many much simpler, to do what I have done
inside ls.c, however, I like it in ls.c, it's convienent. Almost
any conceivable use of ls can be combined with my new -Z switch,
making it convienent to me.
Thanks again for the
comments.
--
goesh
On Thu, June 15, 2006 23:52, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
address@hidden (Bob Proulx) wrote:
>> goesh wrote:
>>> Further, i have used find . -print
>>> to do
the same thing, however, i really like having the absoulte path
>>> in
>>> outputs such as ls -ltr, and i could
not see a way to get find to do
>>> this.
>>> ...
>>> $ ls -ltrZ
>>
>> Well, I can't think of a way to have find sort by time. So it
can't
>> replace the ls -t behavior. But otherwise the
following is similar.
>>
>> find $PWD/* -ls
>
> Hi Bob,
>
> You can make find print
the mod-or-access time as an integer,
> along with the full file
name, and then sort the result on time stamp:
>
> find
$PWD/* -printf '%A@ %p\n'|sort -nr
>
>
This email was sent from goesh.us.
goesh.us
- Re: filutils 4.1, (continued)
- Re: filutils 4.1, The Wanderer, 2006/06/15
- Re: filutils 4.1, James Youngman, 2006/06/15
- find printing full paths (was: filutils 4.1), Bob Proulx, 2006/06/15
- Re: find printing full paths, The Wanderer, 2006/06/15
- Re: find printing full paths, Bob Proulx, 2006/06/16
- Re: find printing full paths, The Wanderer, 2006/06/16
Re: filutils 4.1, Bob Proulx, 2006/06/15
- Re: filutils 4.1, goesh, 2006/06/15
- Re: filutils 4.1, Bob Proulx, 2006/06/16
- Re: filutils 4.1, Jim Meyering, 2006/06/16
- Re: filutils 4.1,
goesh <=
- Re: filutils 4.1, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/16
- Re: filutils 4.1, James Youngman, 2006/06/16