[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "mv a b/" when b does not exist
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: "mv a b/" when b does not exist |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:37:33 +0100 |
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
>> I also would favor (B). But we certainly need testsuite additions to
>> ensure that we don't introduce future regressions against this decision.
>
> OK, it'll be harder to test (B), since that relies on the test suite
> knowing what rename() does. But I guess we can work around that.
It shouldn't be hard.
Just run a little perl snippet to determine what rename() does,
and base the expected results on that.
- "mv a b/" when b does not exist, Tim Waugh, 2005/11/28
- Re: "mv a b/" when b does not exist, Paul Eggert, 2005/11/28
- Re: "mv a b/" when b does not exist, Paul Eggert, 2005/11/30
- Re: "mv a b/" when b does not exist, Eric Blake, 2005/11/30
- Re: "mv a b/" when b does not exist, Paul Eggert, 2005/11/30
- Re: "mv a b/" when b does not exist,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: "mv a b/" when b does not exist, Bob Proulx, 2005/11/30