Re: remove.c patch needed to compile CVS cor3eutils with GCC 4.0.2

[Jim Meyering]

Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> I didn't install this since I figured remove.c might still be
> mutating, and I'm not sure what the assert was supposed to check.
>
> Also, I assumed you wanted to use only declaration-after-statement
> C99, not 'for (declaration ...'  C99, since only the former is
> commonly supported in pre-C99 compilers, but I thought I'd ask to make
> sure.
>
> 2005-11-22  Paul Eggert  <address@hidden>
>
>       * src/remove.c (AD_push): Remove assert that doesn't compile.
>       (rm): Don't assume C99 for (int i = ..., since GCC 4.0.2 rejects
>       it in default mode.

The latter part is fine.
I fixed the first part 40 minutes ago by leaving the assertion
there and restoring the decl/defn I mistakenly removed.