Re: date zh_TW.Big5 +%P

[Abel Cheung]

On 5/1/05, Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> No, it's definitely a bug in strftime: it should not be using
> tolower on the bytes of multibyte strings.  This is on my list
> of things to fix.

Thanks, probably I'm too early to draw conclusion.

About detection of multibyte string, is there any
better method than retrieving LC_TIME and
lookup the charset inside a predefined array
containing known multibyte charset?

>