[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug#294206: stat(1) unclear about block size
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: Bug#294206: stat(1) unclear about block size |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Feb 2005 21:43:50 +0100 |
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> This introduces a new format %S to stat -f -c.
> ...
> Jim, this is an incompatible change to the output of "stat -f", since
> it changes the default format to output both block sizes. I think the
> change is useful, but if you think that's too drastic right now please
> let me know and I'll back this change out for now.
It seems safe enough; I doubt many applications depend on
the default output format.
Thanks for doing that, and for the clean-up.
- Re: Bug#294206: stat(1) unclear about block size, (continued)
- Re: Bug#294206: stat(1) unclear about block size, Michael Stone, 2005/02/08
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Bug#294206: stat(1) unclear about block size, Paul Eggert, 2005/02/08
- Re: Bug#294206: stat(1) unclear about block size, Michael Stone, 2005/02/08
- Re: Bug#294206: stat(1) unclear about block size, Jeroen van Wolffelaar, 2005/02/08
- Re: Bug#294206: stat(1) unclear about block size, James Youngman, 2005/02/09
- Re: Bug#294206: stat(1) unclear about block size, Paul Eggert, 2005/02/09
- Re: Bug#294206: stat(1) unclear about block size, Paul Eggert, 2005/02/09
- Re: Bug#294206: stat(1) unclear about block size, Jeroen van Wolffelaar, 2005/02/09
- Re: Bug#294206: stat(1) unclear about block size,
Jim Meyering <=