Re: Showing actual filesizes with ls

[Joakim Rosqvist (JRO.SE)]

>> Showing major/minor-numbers is an interesting idea ("show what ls -l
>> would have shown").
>
>This sounds a bit too much like creeping featurism.  How about if we
>just add a more-general argument that lets you specify the desired
>output fields, as a format string?  That's in the TODO list.  It would
>solve your problem, no?
 
An arbitrary format string would of course be the most flexible solution, 
and would solve my problem too (unless it is limited to altering the long 
listing format).
 
I'm looking forward to seeing that implemented!
 
/Joakim