[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ls bug?
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: ls bug? |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Jul 2004 10:48:18 +0200 |
Good.
I'm letting the list know, too.
"David Favro" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 00:19:12 +0200, Jim Meyering <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the report.
BTW, Tim, here's a link to it:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.core-utils.bugs/2459
>> Would you please see if you can reproduce the problem
>> using ls built from these unmodified sources?
>>
>> ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/coreutils/coreutils-5.2.1.tar.gz
>> ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/coreutils/coreutils-5.2.1.tar.bz2
>>
>> I'm pretty sure the version that comes with RH/Fedora includes
>> significant patches.
>
> You are right, that fixed it. I hadn't tried building it since
> Fedora's version number matched the latest from your source, and it
> seems unusual for an O/S distribution to make mods to such a
> "generic" utility. I guess I'll report it to Fedora. Thanks again.
- ls bug?, David Favro, 2004/07/04
- Re: ls bug?, Jim Meyering, 2004/07/04
- Message not available
- Re: ls bug?,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: ls bug?, Tim Waugh, 2004/07/05