[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug in date command
From: |
Bauke Jan Douma |
Subject: |
Re: bug in date command |
Date: |
Fri, 14 May 2004 12:08:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 11:27:53AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Bauke Jan Douma <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 12:51:20AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >> "duncan brown" <address@hidden> writes:
> >>
> >> > date +%C reports the 20th century, but we've been in the 21st since jan
> >> > 01, 00:00:00
> >>
> >> %C century (year divided by 100 and truncated to an integer) [00-99]
> >
> > Surely this must be a Y2K-ism in the standard, no?
>
> Why?
>
> $ date +%C%y
> 2004
I am sorry, I answered under the assumption that you wrote
'truncated to the closest integer'.
Still, there is discrepancy in one common meaning of the word
'century' and the meaning it has here, as the original
poster noted. Here it apparently means something like 'the
century part of the full year-number.'
BJ