[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "conformance" vs. compatibility
|
From: |
Jim Meyering |
|
Subject: |
Re: "conformance" vs. compatibility |
|
Date: |
Wed, 05 Nov 2003 04:35:04 +0100 |
> Good point. The README is a bit obsolete anyway, as it talks about
> "POSIX.2". Here's a proposed patch.
>
> 2003-11-04 Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
>
> * README: Document _POSIX2_VERSION.
>
> --- README.~1.12.~ Tue Jul 29 13:55:00 2003
> +++ README Tue Nov 4 10:50:42 2003
Thank you, Paul.
I've just applied that.
Re: "conformance" vs. compatibility, Paul Eggert, 2003/11/03
Re: "conformance" vs. compatibility,
Jim Meyering <=