[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nohup?
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: nohup? |
Date: |
27 Sep 2003 15:56:07 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
address@hidden (Bob Proulx) writes:
> Could you describe what that option does for those of us not having
> access to a solaris machine?
On Solaris 9, "nohup -p pid ..." arranges for the referenced processes
to become immune to hangups.
Similiarly, "nohup -g pgid ..." arranges for the referenced process
groups to become immune to hangups.
There are two other related options:
-F "force". Grab control of the target process, even if another
process already has control.
-a "always". Change the disposition of SIGHUP and SIGQUIT even if the
process has installed a handler for either signal.
I don't know why someone would want these options.
Perhaps JGraham can explain why they'd be useful.
- nohup?, JGraham, 2003/09/27
- Re: nohup?, Bob Proulx, 2003/09/27
- Re: nohup?,
Paul Eggert <=