[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pwd vs. extremely long pathnames
From: |
Samium Gromoff |
Subject: |
Re: pwd vs. extremely long pathnames |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:32:50 +0300 |
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:23:53 +0300
Samium Gromoff <address@hidden> wrote:
> Given a quite long path (>4093 bytes), "pwd | wc -l" never produces a
> number more than
> 4093.
> pwd from coreutils-4.5.7/glibc-2.3.1/linux-2.4.18 basically seems to
> cut the pathname.
>
> regards, Serge Kosyrev, aka Samium Gromoff
Oh sorry folks, it seems that bash is the reason for this - $PWD itsel
is limited to
~4090 bytes it seems
regards, Serge Kosyrev, aka Samium Gromoff